Retouching is such a peculiar profession; essentially, we spend countless hours working on the minor details of an image, in order to make the image look as close to ‘in-camera’ perfect as possible. It’s like some sort of tireless and bizarre quest for an unnatural natural perfection. Of course, some retouchers prefer to leave a much more overstated impact on the final image; but really, only other retouch nerds are going to be able to spot these flourishes. When the general image viewing public consumes these images, they’re much more likely to comment on the incredible photography, rather than the outstanding retouching, on display.
I recently started to receive a small amount of traffic from the
We sort of exist in a photographic world now where revealing unretouched images is almost unheard of. When I received the raw files for this story, I was blown away by the phenomenal level of skill present in Hannah’s lighting, direction and composition, not to mention the amazing work by the hair and make up artists (
To that end, and with Hannah’s permission, I’m posting a single raw file from the shoot and comparing it, side-by-side, with the final retouched image. Unfortunately, it’s quite rare that we are able to make these sorts of informed evaluations on what’s actually been done to an image in Photoshop post-capture; in order to promote the ideals of a more transparent form of retouching, it’s so refreshing to be able to freely show a before and after and inform people precisely what has been edited.